R v D.D. [Lethbridge Provincial Court]

The client was charged with failure or refusal to blow contrary to s 254(5) of the Criminal Code after making a number of attempts at a roadside breath instrument but failing to provide an adequate sample. 

Successful Results: The charges were replaced with obstruction of justice under s 129 for which the client was entered into Alternative Measures (AMP). As a result, the client obtained no driving suspension and no criminal record. 

This entry was posted in TONII ROULSTON, tagged Impaired Driving Cases and posted on May 2015

< Return to Cases